Skip to main content
Corporate Profile
Corporate Overview
Corporate Profile
Officers & Directors
Committee Charting
Governance Documents
Corporate Sustainability
Stock Information
Stock Quote
Historic Prices
Dividends
SEC Filings
Documents
Insider Filings
Insider Transactions
Institutional Ownership
Financial Information
Financial Highlights
Deposit Marketshare
As Reported Financial Statements
News & Market Data
Press Releases
Event Calendar
Presentations
Other Information
Information Request
Email Notification
FAQ
IR Site Menu
Privacy Policy
Back to the Corporate Site
Entire IR Site
Documents
Press Releases
Skip Navigation
Full Site Map
Locations
Contact
About
Blog
Log In
Log In
Menu
Personal
Business
Personal
Personal Banking
Banking
Checking
Savings
Borrowing
Mortgages
Loans
Find a Banker
Have you tried Zelle®?
Business
Business Banking
Banking
Checking
Savings
Borrowing
Business Loans
Find a Banker
Discover Remote Deposit
IR MENU
Entire IR Site
Documents
Press Releases
Institutional Ownership
Ownership > 100%
Ownership > 100%
List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:
Double-counting
- On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.
Short Interest
- A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.
A gap between 'as of' dates
- In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.
Other possible reasons:
a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions;
b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues;
c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.
Copyright
,
© Powered By Q4 Inc.